Engineering an edge.

We do not hold crypto. We trade the movements. Over the past year, we poured thousands of hours into pushing past the noise. The systems showcased here are legacy—our past failures, rewrites, and abandoned models. We aren't sharing our alpha, we are sharing our velocity. This is how far we've come, to show you how far we'll go.

The scale of our obsession.

A look at the sheer volume of engineering, data, and hard lessons locked in our archives.

24,833
Total lines of script code spanning custom execution engines (NautilusTrader), Optuna LSTM hyperparameter optimizations, and asynchronous exchange adapters.
600
Years of simulated trading history across our entire token universe, pushing past visual verification limits.
~$50
The initial tuition fee paid to Kraken when a lagging webhook wiped out a naively placed test position.
0%
Tolerance for "Future Data Leakage." We threw away a 5,000% backtest result the moment we identified a vectorbt flaw.

A timeline of finding out what doesn't work.

Phase 1 & 2: Summer 2025

Trailing the market.

Initially, we believed NLP sentiment analysis on mainstream news could beat the market. We attempted to scrape CBC News to predict trends, but quickly learned markets move radically faster than the news cycle. We then tried simple SMA crossovers. The harsh reality of the "Chop" hit us—sideways markets trigger frequent false crossovers, and exchange fees bleed out any small gains. The remnants of these earliest, naive strategy scripts live in the Strategy Research folder.

Phase 3 & 4: Mid-Summer 2025

Shadow boxing with WebSockets.

We attempted to front-run meme coin launches on the Solana blockchain by signing manual transactions directly over Helius RPC setups. Blindly relying on AI snippets to map complex low-level networking constraints ended up burning hours of development with minimal upside. We learned that sheer execution speed means nothing if you lack foundational infrastructural understanding.

Phase 5: September 2025

The Webhook Valley.

Seeking scalable execution, we bought "proven" commercial algorithms via TradingView and hooked them to the Kraken API. They were highly over-optimized for backrests but failed miserably in the live market. High lag in webhooks and bad stop-loss handling wiped out our early test capital ($50 tuition fee) almost instantly using Flask webhook servers.

Phase 6 & 7: Winter 2025-2026

Asynchrony and Native Python.

We completely discarded commercial algorithms. Shifting to custom Python via Pine Agents, we broke free from TradingView's 2.5-month data limits. We wrote a new asynchronous Quart backend from scratch to prevent I/O blocking across multiple simultaneous token updates. This unlocked reliable 3+ year backtests and gave us the confidence to drop naive ML in favor of pure deterministic logic filtering.

Architecting rigorous systems.

We abandoned naive indicators early on. By developing custom NautilusTrader backends hooked into asynchronous WebSockets via Quart, we solved the I/O blocking problem. Core to our architecture is the AccountState.Lock, an Asyncio mutex ensuring that our Signal Generator and Risk Manager never operate on conflicting real-time tick data, guaranteeing zero race conditions during state reconciliation on Hyperliquid.

On the Machine Learning front, we initially dug deep into classification problems. We rejected basic price targets and used Stratified Training Splits to prevent "Zero-Class Convergence." We ran heavy Optuna trials for our TensorFlow Metal LSTM models, employing rolling normalizations (N=200). Ultimately, we learned that the complexity of ML models wasn't yielding robust execution. Consequently, our newer versions have entirely moved on from ML approaches in favor of precise, deterministic filters.

While the models we trade with today remain completely offline, this archive demonstrates our commitment to scaling institutional-grade execution algorithms.